Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 38.7.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 48.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1501 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1511 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1409 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.