Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 5 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 27.3 to 22.7.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 40.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-07-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.57 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.30 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1399 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 63.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.1% |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 597.5 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 35.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 59.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 59.2% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1384 |
| SimpleBench | — | 26.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 64.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.02 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.2 |
Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1396 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 65.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1363 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1324 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | — | 1379 |
| LMArena German | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1383 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1347 |
| IFEval | — | 85% |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1353 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.6% |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1380 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1349 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1371 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 85.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1666 |
| WildBench | — | 86.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.