Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.3 to 47.2.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 40.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1367 |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
Math Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1366 |
Knowledge Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1331 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1332 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Step 3 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.