Model comparison
Granite 4.2 8B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 38.4 to 34.2.
- Granite 4.2 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 40.5 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1270 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1329 | 1264 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 8B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1384 | 1248 |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1302 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1285 | 1258 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1301 | 1245 |
Long Context Too close to call
Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1236 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1301 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 8B or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.