Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 38.4 to 34.2.
  • Granite 4.2 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Granite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderIBMTencent
Noometry Index40.537.9
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked1112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding13801270

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts13291264

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math—1274

Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert13841248

Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English13021262
LMArena Chinese13661319
LMArena Russian12851258

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following13011245

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query13241301

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text13201274
LMArena Creative Writing12361242
LMArena Multi-Turn13011275

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper