Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 34.2.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.945.3
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding12701473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12641460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math12741466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert12481467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12621445
LMArena Chinese13191510
LMArena Russian12581457
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12451440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query13011455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text12741455
LMArena Creative Writing12421439
LMArena Multi-Turn12751460

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.1 vs 36.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper