Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.5-9B
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 34.2.
- Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 33.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.46 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.5-9B?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5-9B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.