Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs o1-mini

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 3 categories and o1-mini in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 25.0 to 8.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and o1-mini specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index37.934.0
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Coding12701362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts12641333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Math12741358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Too close to call

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Expert12481316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multilingual o1-mini leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Non-English12621289
LMArena Chinese13191314
LMArena Russian12581283
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following12451304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Longer Query13011320

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10o1-mini
LMArena Text12741317
LMArena Creative Writing12421244
LMArena Multi-Turn12751314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than o1-mini?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or o1-mini better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper