Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen1.5-14B

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

32.7

Rank #253 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 47.2 to 33.6.
  • Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen1.5-14B specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.932.7
Released—2024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Coding12701138

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts12641113

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Math12741125

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Expert12481094
MMLU—68.6%

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Non-English12621095
LMArena Chinese13191147
LMArena Russian12581046
LMArena French—1116
LMArena German—1043
LMArena Japanese—1019
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Instruction Following12451102

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Longer Query13011113

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen1.5-14B
LMArena Text12741128
LMArena Creative Writing12421091
LMArena Multi-Turn12751110

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen1.5-14B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper