Model comparison

Mercury vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 17.5.

Side by side

Mercury and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
MercuryMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderInceptionMeta
Noometry Index37.650.3
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked931

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Mercury: 38.7 (#170), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding13221495
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mercury: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Mercury: 17.5 (#293), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts12851486
SimpleBench—74.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark21.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.87

Math Not comparable

Mercury: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math—1471

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
LMArena Expert—1480

Multimodal Not comparable

Mercury: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Mercury: 41.6 (#206), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English12601478
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1513
LMArena Russian—1487
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Mercury: 65.2 (#224), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following12391461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Mercury: 38.4 (#198), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query12661475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Mercury: 46.2 (#221), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text12821482
LMArena Creative Writing11911449
LMArena Multi-Turn12821494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mercury or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper