Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mistral Small 3.1

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.4

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.0 to 13.7.
  • Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index37.231.4
Released—2025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked1228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding12701309

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12641278
Chess Puzzles—1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Math12741261
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Expert12481258
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Too close to call

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English12621255
LMArena Chinese13191254
LMArena Russian12581263
LMArena French—1270
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1210
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following12451264
IFEval—75%

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query13011300

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text12741278
LMArena Creative Writing12421253
LMArena Multi-Turn12751270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper