Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.6 to 47.4.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 39.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.42 |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1432 |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1431 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1443 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1414 |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1414 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.5 vs 35.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.