Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 47.2.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1396 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1425 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.1 vs 36.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.