Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.8 to 47.4.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1270 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1264 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1248 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1258 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1245 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.