Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mercury 2.5
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 23.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 33.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury 2.5 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mercury 2.5?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Mercury 2.5 better for coding?
Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 4.