Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3-70B

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 12.8.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 3-70B specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index37.928.8
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1231

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Coding12701206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12641195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.93
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Math12741218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Expert12481149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English12621142
LMArena Chinese13191114
LMArena Russian12581159
LMArena French—1232
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12451194

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query13011174

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-70B
LMArena Text12741221
LMArena Creative Writing12421210
LMArena Multi-Turn12751223

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3-70B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 3-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper