Model comparison
Llama 3-70B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 33.6 to 12.0.
Side by side
| Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-04-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 31 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1292 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1272 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | 1294 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1231 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1169 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1246 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3-70B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3-70B or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.