Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 34.5.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.045.0
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding13071473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12861460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.39

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math12811467
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert12761467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1281
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12651445
LMArena Chinese13461510
LMArena Russian12661457
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1411
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Spanish—1453

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12771439

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query13421454

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text12881454
LMArena Creative Writing12641439
LMArena Multi-Turn12841459

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper