Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #68 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.8 to 48.7.
  • Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.8 27B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.646.0
Released—2026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked1231

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Coding13071482
LMArena WebDev—1593
SciCode—46.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
APEX-Agents—47.5%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861460
ARC-AGI-2—42.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—54.5%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—5.4%
DTBench—88%
LMCA—41.4%
Surface Evolver Bench—45%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.38

Math Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Math12811456
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Expert12761482

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision—1271

Multilingual Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Non-English12651430
LMArena Chinese13461504
LMArena Russian12661415
LMArena French—1465
LMArena German—1438
LMArena Japanese—1384
LMArena Korean—1393
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Instruction Following12771439

Long Context Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Longer Query13411450

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text12881441
LMArena Creative Writing12641384
LMArena Multi-Turn12841441
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1671

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.8 27B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper