Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3 14B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 24.5 to 18.1.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 35.0 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3 14B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 36.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.