Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Phi-4

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

30.9

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 33.1 to 19.6.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Phi-4 specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index38.030.9
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Coding13071231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts12861220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.43
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Math12811246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Expert12761203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Non-English12651197
LMArena Chinese13461211
LMArena Russian12661209
LMArena French—1223
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Instruction Following12771201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Longer Query13421217

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Phi-4
LMArena Text12881217
LMArena Creative Writing12641182
LMArena Multi-Turn12841206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Phi-4?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Phi-4 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Phi-4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper