Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.1

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 47.9 to 38.9.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index38.138.8
Released2026-02-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13801346
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1386—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13721322
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math13781305
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert13781307
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13381275
LMArena Chinese13921304
LMArena French13631328
LMArena German13611283
LMArena Korean12321206
LMArena Russian13591268
LMArena Spanish13541337
LMArena Japanese1169—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13531298

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13671312
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13591311
LMArena Creative Writing13311264
LMArena Multi-Turn13641309
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper