Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 35.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderTencentXiaomi
Noometry Index38.648.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding13071504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12861482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math12811468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert12761501

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12651434
LMArena Chinese13461511
LMArena Russian12661409
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12771463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13411463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text12881455
LMArena Creative Writing12641400
LMArena Multi-Turn12841451

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper