Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 48.7.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderTencentXiaomi
Noometry Index38.645.2
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding13071503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12861488
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math12811481
ProofBench—22%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert12761503

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English12651449
LMArena Chinese13461507
LMArena Russian12661450
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1412
LMArena Korean—1437
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12771477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query13411483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text12881465
LMArena Creative Writing12641440
LMArena Multi-Turn12841477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper