Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3.2 3B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 48.7 to 24.7.
- Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 28.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1095 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1126 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1090 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 949 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1089 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | 1100 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1094 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1105 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3.2 3B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3.2 3B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.