Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 33.1 to 11.8.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 28.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.