Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3.1-8B

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-8B Meta

23.0

Rank #352 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.1 to 8.0.
  • Llama 3.1-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index38.623.0
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1243

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Coding13071195
SciCode—13.2%
WeirdML—1.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.5%
HumanEval+—62.8%
MBPP+—55.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—25.8%
BALROG—15.1%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861175
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—5.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.57
PIQA—81.2%

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Math12811179
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.7%
Omni-MATH—13.7%
MATH Level 5—22.9%
GSM8K—82.4%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Expert12761144
GPQA Diamond—27%
MMLU-Pro—40.6%
GPQA (HELM)—24.7%
BoolQ—82.8%
MMLU—56.1%

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Non-English12651148
LMArena Chinese13461151
LMArena Russian12661158
LMArena French—1177
LMArena German—1144
LMArena Japanese—1061
LMArena Korean—1053
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12771159
IFEval—74.3%

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Longer Query13411182

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Text12881187
LMArena Creative Writing12641154
LMArena Multi-Turn12841172
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—713
WildBench—68.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3.1-8B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 3.1-8B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3.1-8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-8B has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper