Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.1 to 7.0.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1286 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1276 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1266 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1277 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1341 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.