Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Trinity Large Thinking
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Arcee AISummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 24.8 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 38.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Trinity Large Thinking leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1268 | 1366 |
Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Trinity Large Thinking leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | 1334 |
Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Trinity Large Thinking share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.