Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 34.4.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 51.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1268 | 1490 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Qwen3.7 Max: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 1484 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | 1460 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.7 Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.