Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 34.4.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.651.5
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding13081471
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts12571457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math12681465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert12521478
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English12361437
LMArena Chinese12871487
LMArena Russian12431445
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12511438

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query12801457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text12631447
LMArena Creative Writing12481435
LMArena Multi-Turn12541456

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper