Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Phi-4

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 35.5 to 20.8.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.631.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Coding13081231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts12571220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Math12681246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Expert12521203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
MMLU—84.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Phi-4: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Non-English12361197
LMArena Chinese12871212
LMArena Russian12431209
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following12511201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query12801217

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionPhi-4
LMArena Text12631217
LMArena Creative Writing12481182
LMArena Multi-Turn12541206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Phi-4?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Phi-4 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Phi-4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper