Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Mistral Small 3.2
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 32.8 to 24.9.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.73 |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1250 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1279 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.