Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs phi-3-medium 14B

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 34.4 to 9.1.
  • phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Hunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.629.7
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1308—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Reasoning Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Hard Prompts1257—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—121.23
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Math1268—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond—27.6%
LMArena Expert1252—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1236—
LMArena Chinese1287—
LMArena Russian1243—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1251—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1280—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visionphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1263—
LMArena Creative Writing1248—
LMArena Multi-Turn1254—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper