Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 46.5 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1308 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1257 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1268 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1252 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1243 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1251 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1254 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.