Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs o1

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 1 category and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 38.9.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and o1 specifications
Hunyuan Large Visiono1
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index37.640.9
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1352

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), o1: 46.1 (#70)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Coding13081367
Aider Polyglot—61.7%
WeirdML—47.6%
LiveBench Coding—69.7%
CadEval—56%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—80.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning o1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), o1: 27.9 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Hard Prompts12571371
SimpleBench—41.7%
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
Chess Puzzles—15%
EnigmaEval—5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—91.6%
DTBench—74.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA—22.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.91
LiveBench—75.7%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), o1: 36.1 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Math12681388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math—80.3%
MATH Level 5—94.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%

Knowledge o1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), o1: 41.5 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Expert12521361
GPQA Diamond—76.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
Confabulations—11.7%

Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), o1: 34.2 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Vision11801168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual o1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), o1: 48.6 (#142)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Non-English12361358
LMArena Chinese12871394
LMArena Russian12431356
LMArena French—1344
LMArena German—1337
LMArena Japanese—1346
LMArena Korean—1396
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following o1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), o1: 74.8 (#86)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Instruction Following12511367
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.5%

Long Context o1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), o1: 50.3 (#9)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Longer Query12801378
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference o1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), o1: 55.6 (#144)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large Visiono1
LMArena Text12631366
LMArena Creative Writing12481348
LMArena Multi-Turn12541369
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LiveBench Language—65.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and o1 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper