Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 62.4 to 46.5.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index41.037.6
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked4813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14791308
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
LMArena WebDev1390—
WeirdML45.9%—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
Terminal-Bench38%—
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14431257
SimpleBench60%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA37.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.12—
ForecastBench62—

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14311268
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14391252
GPQA Diamond77.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—

Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision—1180
VPCT35%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14051236
LMArena Chinese14271287
LMArena Russian14221243
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1413—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14351251

Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14551280

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14191263
LMArena Creative Writing14121248
LMArena Multi-Turn14441254
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper