Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Mistral Small 3.1

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 35.5 to 14.7.
  • Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index37.631.7
Released—2025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked1328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding13081309

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12571278
Chess Puzzles—1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Math12681262
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Expert12521257
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%

Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision11801136

Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English12361255
LMArena Chinese12871253
LMArena Russian12431263
LMArena French—1273
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following12511264
IFEval—75%

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query12801299

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text12631277
LMArena Creative Writing12481253
LMArena Multi-Turn12541270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.3 vs 38.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper