Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Mistral Small 3.1

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 35.9 to 14.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index37.631.7
Released2024-09-062025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked2228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding13091309
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12891278
Chess Puzzles—1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Math12881262
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%

Knowledge DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Expert12661257
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English12731255
LMArena Chinese13181253
LMArena French12891273
LMArena German12581266
LMArena Japanese12281208
LMArena Korean12091206
LMArena Russian12891263
LMArena Spanish12481283

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following12801264
IFEval—75%

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query13011299

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text12941277
LMArena Creative Writing12851253
LMArena Multi-Turn12971270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Mistral Small 3.1?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper