Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 34.4.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.643.3
Released—2026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1308—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1257—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1268—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1252—

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1236—
LMArena Chinese1287—
LMArena Russian1243—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1251—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1280—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1263—
LMArena Creative Writing1248—
LMArena Multi-Turn1254—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper