Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index. Grok Build 0.1 costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 3 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

35.8

Rank #214 Reported

Qwen3.7 Max

Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 48.4 to 31.3.
Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
Provider	xAI	Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index	35.8	51.4
Released	2026-04-16	2026-05-19
Weights	Proprietary	Proprietary
Context window	256K	1M
Max output	256K	131K
Input $ / M tokens	$1	$2.50
Output $ / M tokens	$2	$7.50
Results tracked	3	33

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
SciCode	50.2%	48.8%
SWE-bench Verified	—	77.3%
LMArena WebDev	—	1515
LMArena Coding	—	1498
ALE-Bench	—	1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval	2.4%	0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
CritPt	9.1%	13.4%
SimpleBench	—	70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)	—	85.1%
Chess Puzzles	—	19%
EBR-Bench	—	9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts	—	1483
Mystery Game Puzzles	—	32%
DTBench	—	92.3%
LMCA	—	44%
Epoch Capabilities Index	—	153.74

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	—	64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4	—	34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	95.6%
ProofBench	—	26%
LMArena Math	—	1488

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond	—	90.9%
SimpleQA Verified	—	55.8%
LMArena Expert	—	1488

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English	—	1475
LMArena Chinese	—	1533
LMArena Russian	—	1482

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following	—	1460

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query	—	1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text	—	1476
LMArena Creative Writing	—	1450
EQ-Bench 4	—	1110
LMArena Multi-Turn	—	1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.