Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 31.4.
  • Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.551.5
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding12491498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12401483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math12471490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
Omni-MATH29.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert12511488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English12161474
LMArena Chinese12491530
LMArena Russian12011484
LMArena Spanish1258—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12221460
IFEval89%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query12421482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text12411476
LMArena Creative Writing12111449
LMArena Multi-Turn12421481
WildBench73.9%—
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen3.7 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper