Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 24.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.