Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok Build 0.1
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 21.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 35.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181), Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1309 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | — |
| LMArena French | 1346 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1302 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Grok Build 0.1?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.