Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 22.6.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.