Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 32.0 to 19.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 56.9% for Granite 4.0 H Small and 41.4% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1210 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1208 |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1208 |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | 28.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1187 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1186 |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1199 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.