Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Mistral Nemo
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 8.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok Build 0.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 20.7.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 128K |
| Max output | 256K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Mistral Nemo?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 8.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok Build 0.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.