Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 256K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), MiMo-V2-Omni: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.1 vs 43.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.