Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index. Grok Build 0.1 costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

35.8

Rank #214 Reported

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #82 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 22.0.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
  • Qwen3 Max accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3 Max specifications
Grok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.843.5
Released2026-04-162025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K262K
Max output256K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1$1.20
Output $ / M tokens$2$6
Results tracked333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
SciCode50.2%—
LMArena Coding—1456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
GBAEval2.4%—
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
CritPt9.1%—
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.41

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1447
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English—1429
LMArena Chinese—1479
LMArena French—1450
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1399
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1463

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1420

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3 Max
LMArena Text—1439
LMArena Creative Writing—1401
LMArena Multi-Turn—1446

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index. Grok Build 0.1 costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3 Max?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.5 vs 42.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Max does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper