Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 26.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 9.1% for Grok Build 0.1 and 4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Grok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index36.445.2
Released2026-04-162026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K1.05M
Max output256K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$2$0.87
Results tracked327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
SciCode50.2%50.2%
LMArena WebDev—1479
LMArena Coding—1503
ALE-Bench—899.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
GBAEval2.4%—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
CritPt9.1%4%
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1488
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProofBench—22%
LMArena Math—1481

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert—1503

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1449
LMArena Chinese—1507
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1412
LMArena Korean—1437
LMArena Russian—1450
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1483

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text—1465
LMArena Creative Writing—1440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper