Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

35.8

Rank #214 Reported

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 38.4 to 31.3.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
Grok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.845.0
Released2026-04-162026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K1M
Max output256K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$2$1.60
Results tracked332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
SciCode50.2%45.5%
FrontierCode—10.2%
LMArena Coding—1473

Agentic & Tool Use Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
GBAEval2.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
CritPt9.1%9.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
Chess Puzzles—24%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.39

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1467

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1281
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1411
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1453

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1439

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1454

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text—1454
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
LMArena Multi-Turn—1459

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper